Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. (En línea) ; 86(1): 3-13, feb. 2021. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388623

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVO: Analizar la evolución y los costes de los partos prematuros iatrogénicos en un hospital universitario de tercer nivel. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de los partos con edad gestacional comprendida entre 24 y 36+6 semanas en dos periodos temporales: 2001-2005 y 2011-2016. Se identificaron los partos prematuros por indicación médica o iatrogénicos (PPI). Se analizaron variables demográficas y de resultado. Los costes se calcularon mediante el grupo relacionado con el diagnóstico (GRD) de cada ingreso. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo una muestra de 620 partos prematuros iatrogénicos. La tasa de prematuridad global se mantuvo estable en 9%. La tasa de prematuridad iatrogénica experimentó un incremento relativo del 9,7%. Entre las pacientes con un PPI se apreció un incremento en la edad materna de 27,7 a 32,9 años, de la obesidad (32,2% a 55,5%) y del uso de técnicas de reproducción asistida (6% a 11,1%). Preeclampsia y retraso del crecimiento (CIR) fueron las principales causas de PPI, en los que se incrementó la tasa de cesáreas de 66,9% a 78%, la estancia media de 7,8 días a 9,6 y el coste por paciente de 3.068,6 a 7.331,9 euros. CONCLUSIONES: Se observa un aumento de PPI en el segundo periodo, manteniéndose la prematuridad global. Los cambios demográficos podrían explicar este incremento. Estos cambios están implicados en la fisiopatología de la preeclampsia y el CIR y en el aumento de su incidencia. La prevención primaria y secundaria de esas complicaciones podría reducir la incidencia y los costes de la prematuridad iatrogénica.


INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence, evolution, causes and costs of premature births (PB) due to medical indication (iatrogenic) in a tertiary care university hospital METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all deliveries with gestational age between 24 and 36+6 weeks, in two periods 2001-2005 and 2011-2016. Iatrogenic births were identified. Clinical, epidemiological, diagnostic and economic variables were analysed. RESULTS: A sample size of 620 iatrogenic deliveries was obtained. We found a 9.7% relative increase in iatrogenic prematurity rate in the second period as well as an increase in maternal age from 27.7 to 32.9, obesity from 32.2% to 55.5% and the use of assisted reproductive techniques from 6% to 11.1%. Preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction were found to be the main causes of iatrogenic premature delivery. In these cases the rates of cesarean section increased from 66.9% to 78%. The average stay per patient and the cost calculated by diagnosis related group (DRG) also showed a statistically significant increase from 7.8 days and 3,068.6 euros to 9.6 days and 7,331.9 euros. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an increase in iatrogenic prematurity in the second period despite the unchanged rate of spontaneous PB. Demographic changes in the population, as well as an increase in obstetric related conditions, seem to be responsible for this increase. Primary and secondary prevention of clinical characteristics may reduce the incidence and costs derived from this type of prematurity.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor, Premature/economics , Obstetric Labor, Premature/epidemiology , Tertiary Healthcare , Causality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Gestational Age , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Costs and Cost Analysis , Obstetric Labor, Premature/diagnosis , Obstetric Labor, Premature/etiology , Length of Stay
2.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. (En línea) ; 86(1): 23-32, feb. 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388627

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Analizar si los casos positivos de cribado combinado de trisomía 21 (t21) o trisomía 18 (t18) en ausencia de aneuploidía (falsos positivos- FP) se relacionan con complicaciones de la gestación, ajustando por factores demográficos y clínicos de riesgo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles anidado en una cohorte de pacientes que acudieron para cribado del primer trimestre. Los casos fueron las pacientes con FP de riesgo combinado de t21 superior a 1/270 o riesgo de t18 superior a 1/100. Se consideraron complicaciones de la gestación: óbito fetal, parto prematuro menor de 34 semanas o prematuro menor de 37 semanas, preeclampsia, retrasos de crecimiento, pequeño para la edad gestacional (CIR, PEG) y diabetes gestacional (DG). Se ajustó por obesidad, edad, paridad, tabaquismo, y técnicas de reproducción asistida. RESULTADO: Se obtuvieron 204 casos de FP, 149 FP para trisomía 21, 41 para trisomía 18, y 14 FP para ambos riesgos. Se encontró asociación estadísticamente significativa de FP t21 con óbito fetal (OR=3,5; ic95% 1,4-8,7; p=0,01), parto prematuro menor de 37 semanas (OR=2,2; IC95% 1,4-3,4; p=0,001), preeclampsia (OR =2,6; IC95% 1,17-6,1; p=0,02), PEG (OR =2,2; IC95% 1,2-4,1; p=0,02), CIR (OR=2,8; IC95% 1,6-5,1; p=0,001), y DG (OR=2,1; IC95% 1,2-3,7; p=0,01). Los FP t18 se asociaron con óbito (OR=8,9; IC95% 2,9-27; p=0,002). CONCLUSIÓN: Los FP del cribado del primer trimestre, para trisomía 21 y trisomía 18, se asocian con resultados obstétricos adversos.


We have studied whether positive cases of combined trisomy 21 (t21) or 18 (t18) screening in the absence of aneuploidy (false positives -FP-) are related to pregnancy complications adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study nested in a cohort of patients who came for first trimester aneuploidy screening. The cases were patients with FP combined risk of t21 (greater than 1/270) or t18 risk (greater than 1/100). The control group was a sample of patients with low-risk screening. We considered pregnancy complications: stillbirth, premature delivery before 34 and 37 weeks, preeclampsia, growth retardation, small for gestational age (FGR, SGA), and gestational diabetes (GD). Or were adjusted for obesity, age, parity, smoking, and assisted reproduction techniques. RESULTS: 204 cases of FP were obtained, 149 FP for trisomy 21, 41 for trisomy 18, and 14 FP for both risks. A statistically significant association between t21 FP was found with stillbirth (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-8.7; p = 0.01), preterm delivery less than 37 weeks (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.4; p = 0.001), preeclampsia (OR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.17-6.1; p = 0.02), SGA (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1, 2-4.1; p = 0.02), FGR (OR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.6-5.1; p = 0.001), and GD (OR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.2 −3.7; p = 0.01). FP t18s were associated with fetal loss (OR= 8.9 (95% CI 2.9-27) p = 0.002. CONCLUSION: FP from first trimester screening for t21 and t18 are associated with adverse obstetric outcomes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Trisomy 18 Syndrome/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Trisomy/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Mass Screening , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , False Positive Reactions , Trisomy 18 Syndrome/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL